This is a comment I left at another blog. Thought it was worth its own blog post.
Nobody is telling Elsevier that they have to accept manuscripts that
had been done with NIH or other US Federal funding. They could just
say, “Dude, take your article elsewhere.” It isn’t like they don’t know
that the author final manuscript is going to the PMC 12 months later.
Let me be clear — the versions of articles that are deposited with PubMed Central are manuscripts that have not been peer-reviewed. Here is a list of journals that do/do not accept the publishers “work product.” http://www.urmc.rochester.edu/hslt/miner/research_and_publishing/publisherspoliciesonpubmedcentralminerlibrary.cfm
If anything, the actions and public letters from Elsevier, Wiley, AAA, etc. (See at http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/ostp/library/publicaccess)
will drive more scientist manuscripts to OA publishers. This way, the
public will get to easily read the final published peer-reviewed version
instead of only having free access to the author manuscript.
The scientists are catching on, the publishers are afraid of losing their cash cow.
Thursday, February 2, 2012
Another #RWA response from me. More to come, I am sure.
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Post a Comment